CVSNT is still an actively developed project and there are probably arguments in favour of CVSNT over SVN.
In addition CVS has a longer pedigree, is still a solid tool and probably has a much bigger user base than SVN. My experience is all with CVS so I can't really comment much on SVN. If I was looking to start Source control today SVN would definately be on my list and may win out over CVS. On 3/20/06, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was under the impression that SVN was designed to surpass CVS and is > therefore the successor to CVS. Why would someone start a new CVS > environment then? Am I missing some great features where CVS surpasses > SVN? > > Russ > > > -- Mike T Blog http://www.socialpoints.com/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:235769 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54