On 4/5/06, Che Vilnonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Dave. Hey... does anyone know if 1.4.2_11 is viable to use as well?
> Perhaps it is even better?
>

We're testing it in our staging environment, and it works just fine
(we're using web services, cfhttp, etc., so it's getting a good
workout). However, a potentially big caveat is that we do not use
CFLDAP, which is known to have issues with later versions of the 1.4.2
JVM (I think _05 was the last revision that is known to have worked,
and I haven't tried on _09), and I don't believe Adobe will support
you if you call them for support (they'll make you downgrade first I
believe).

Regards,
Dave.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:237038
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to