We're talking about running on WebLogic, so the points about ServletExec and .NET are irrelevant (though true). Plus, being that's it's a new product, BD for WebLogic, you can't guarantee there are less bugs.
Andy On 19/04/06, Russ Michaels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have seen several benefits. > It has some extra tags and fucntionality, less bugs, and a smaller > footprint if using ServetExec, and the support is better. > Plus it runs on .NET :-) > > Russ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: CF-Talk <cf-talk@houseoffusion.com> > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:37:05 +0100 > Subject: Re: BEA licenses BlueDragon for WebLogic > > > On Monday 17 April 2006 19:37, Vince Bonfanti wrote: > > > Some people might also find it significant that BEA is now > > essentially a > > > competitor to Adobe in a portion of the ColdFusion server market > > (that > > > "portion" being people who are now or are planning to redeploy > > existing > > > CFML applications onto WebLogic servers). > > > > We already run MX on Weblogic. This is a supported configuration and > > works > > great. > > When we last looked, BD was about the same* price for a J2EE version as > > MX. It > > appears that since then BD has improved it's compatability with legacy > > CFML > > code since then, however, it's still the same cost with no extra > > benefit. > > > > Don't mind me though, I'm about to change employers :-) > > > > -- > > > > Tom Chiverton > > Advanced ColdFusion Programmer > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238115 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54