> if you give it the wrong combo of attributes you can take down cf
Correction.... the issue was not yours. I forgot what really happend.
In a cfc if you try to 'var' the imagecr struct with a structNew(), it will 
crash cf. 
The developer, using imageCR for the first time, var'ed it and thought it was 
the attribute combos. 

Don't this the wrong way. ImageCR is a great product and I rely on it. 
I will email you samples of my issues late next week. (I'm at cfunited this 
week).
 
Thanks for you support.

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Mon 6/26/2006 7:31 PM 
        To: CF-Talk 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: Image processing
        
        

        I would just like to say we officially disagree with this assessment.
        
        We process over 50 thousand images daily with ImageCR and stand
        behind our products 100%, as we have for years. We will address
        any possible issues by mail: support-imagecr at efflare.com.
        
        We are considering a Java wrapper, but it should be remembered
        Java itself wraps non-Java libraries for similar functionality.
        
        --
         Magnus
        
        > Luis,
        >
        > > why you will going to change to the Alagad Image Component
        >
        > I'd like to switch to Alagad mostly due it's CFC'ness and the fact 
that
        > it's all native java within cf. Also, the 500 image limitation we ran
        > into w/ imagecr3. Other than that, I have no "real" reasons.
        >
        > I plan to do the prudent testing and research against both options the
        > next time this topic comes up. Right now, I just don't have the time.
        >
        > ImageCR3 is very good. Pros: fast, flexible, reliable. Cons: 500 batch
        > limit, if you give it the wrong combo of attributes you can take down 
cf
        > :(
        > but that's stuff you work out in the development phases of your
        > projects.
        >
        > If you are still trying to decide, download the eval editions of both
        > and run some tests on the exact functions you need to perform. I'd be
        > interested in the results.
        >
        > Justin Hansen
        > Project Manager
        > Uhlig LLC
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Luis Rueda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 3:56 PM
        > To: CF-Talk
        > Subject: Re: Image processing
        >
        > Hello Justin, i am interested in your experience, why you will going 
to
        > change to the Alagad Image Component, at the time we will have the
        > necessity to do some image manipulation and want to start with a good
        > solution principally in terms of CPU usage and image manipulation 
speed,
        > thanks for your comments.
        >
        > Luis Rueda
        >
        > Bizglo.com
        >
        > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        
        

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245096
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to