Sure. Business objects (i.e. the Model, e.g. Agent, Location, Customer, User, Quotes, etc) all were Java. DAOs too as I recall (I remember discovering that I could instantiate coldfusion.sql.QueryTable objects in my Java DAOs). Everything else (views, filters, listeners) was done in CF.
Does that help? Dave Jones NetEffect At 03:14 AM 8/30/2006, you wrote: >Hi Dave, would you be willing to share any information as to >exactly how you've divided the functionality between the items >described below. > > >Another way to identify what goes where is to follow the natural > >MVC boundaries: Model = Java, View = CF, Controller = either, but > >probably CF. IMHO, that allows each language to play to its > >strengths. I followed this division of labor in a Mach-II app and > >it worked great. But as Denny pointed out, it might not be so > >great for the client. The next developer that picks up the app > >will need to know both CF and Java. > > > >Dave Jones > >NetEffect > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251504 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
