Fusebox, what an over blated piece of shit.... No seriously why does a framework have anything to do with a quote being won, tell me I use my own framework till I got stuck into MG:U and it has worked and performed much faster and not as bloated as fusebox is.
So, tell me again why being a fusebox developer would win me a contract? It shouold boil down to can I deliver on time, will I met the budget set forth, and will I be able to deliver the product the client needs:-) Shit, there are times when I know MG:U and MachII aren't upto the job. So what makes fusebox the be all and end all to determine a job:-) On 11/4/06, Greg Luce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was shopping the same thing last year and ended up with WebApper > Services > (SeeFusion fellas). They nosed out Figleaf, Teratech, and a handful of > others. I was looking for cutting edge Fusebox development though. My 2 > main > factors were technology and cost. They won on both. > > Greg > > On 11/2/06, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I know a few of the guys at AboutWeb and wouldn't hesistate to > > recommend the company based on my perceptions of their skills. > > > > I have no experience with the company itself (as a client, contractor, > > employee, or otherwise). But if the sum of the parts is greater than > > the whole, I think you'd be in very good shape. > > > > On 11/2/06, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Who are the top 3 companies that develop ColdFusion on a > > > > project basis? > > > > > > It depends on way too many things. What coding styles do you prefer > > > (frameworks or not, etc.), if you need project management, your > budget, > > > where the company is based, timeline, etc. > > > > > > This is like the question we see here about once a week, "What hosting > > > company do you prefer". The answer? It depends. :) > > > > > > > > > ------------- > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > This transmission may contain information that is privileged, > > confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you > are > > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, > > copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein > (including > > any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this > > transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy > the > > material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. > Thank > > you. > > > > > > > > > ============================================================================== > > > "EMF <idahopower.com>" made the previous annotations. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:259009 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
