lol. Yeah, they always do. :-D On 11/28/06, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Linux users would argue otherwise :-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 November 2006 22:13 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Vista (was: CrystalTech outage?) > > Aren't all comps open to hack/attacks... > > > > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of > the > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please > note > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or > call > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within > this > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Munson, Jacob > To: CF-Talk > Sent: Tue Nov 28 21:56:27 2006 > Subject: RE: Vista (was: CrystalTech outage?) > > > They actually let hackers take a shot at Vista this summer and rave > > reviews came out of it. I think 1 person was able to trick UAC but > > this was in...hrmmm...I think Beta 2. That hole was covered in the > > next major release. > > See, this is exactly what I'm talking about. I have no doubt that Vista > will be more secure than XP, merely because of the non-admin user thing. > But there /will/ be holes that allow hackers to bypass the UAC stuff. > Mark my words. Will antivirus programs solve this? They could, but like > Dave pointed out you still have to have updated virus definitions (which > should be automated anyway). > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential > and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any > reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this > transmission > in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material > in > its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. > > > ============================================================================ > == > "EMF <idahopower.com>" made the previous annotations. > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:261958 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
