Rick Root wrote: > Mary Jo Sminkey wrote: > >> Why would you *not* want something that you know follows some logical coding >> pattern versus some unknown spagetti code? >> > > To a developer who might not know fusebox or mach-II might consider FB > to be spaghetti code :) > Then this is their own problem and do not change the 'truth'. :)
When there is not any well known method/framework used, I personally do not prefer this kind of code and I don't trust it. > It's possible that the original author uses his own coding styles and > rules, and integrating a fusebox or mach-ii based app might be too much > trouble. > I heard this a lot but I personally do not know any developer who has his/her own method and creates a good code. :) The developers that I have respect - all of them- are using one of the known frameworks. > Just because you don't use a "common" framework doesn't mean there isn't > logic and design to your code. > > For me it does! > Rick > > OÄuz Demirkapı TeraTech Inc. | Senior Developer 405 East Gude Dr Suite 207, Rockville, MD 20850, USA Voice: +1 (301) 424-3903 ext 111 | Fax: +1 (301) 762-8185 Web: http://www.teratech.com | E-mail: oguz.demirkapi <AT> teratech.com Winner in CFDJ awards Best Consulting. Member Team Fusebox. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:262570 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
