I guess you both stopped reading just before this... > This all, of course, depends on how MUCH data we are talking > about though. You don't want to overload a JS array on a > windows 95 machine running IE 4.5 and 64 megs of ram ;-)
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -----Original Message----- From: Doug Bezona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 11:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Anyone familiar with the CF_TwoSelectsRelated custom tag? >Ehhhh... I donââ¬â¢t think I'd totally agree with >that. One load versus a >load >every time you make a selection. If it's all >client side and in js arrays >already, the changes would be much >faster than an asynchronous call to >another process to get the info. The issue with large JS arrays isn't so much that the size of the page gets large, but that JS is just rather slow and at a certain point it IS faster to do the remote call instead. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:263272 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
