Gert Franz said: > > I read all the posts from you guys saying that there should be no > reason to host Railo since it is only compatible to version MX 6.1. > And you know you are absolutely right, if you do not care for: > - security
I don't care about security as long as my part in the whole picture is far from the weakest link. And realistically, every CFML runtime is far from the weakest link: users are. > - performance I don't care. I really don't. No CFML runtime is magically going to make a database faster. No CFML runtime is magically going to make a remote webservice faster. And those are the types of resources I have performance issues with. > - price Not an issue in the market segment I work most of the time. But that is not to say that Railo doesn't have good stuff. The one thing that really stands out is the concept of a site that immediately is a security container for file access. Perfect for shared hosting. I love it. I have even asked Macromedia to copy it. But is simply not relevant in my current work. I think that once Railo 1.1 is out I will put it in the buildfarm again so our applications run automatic regression tests against it. I like having applications that work on more then one runtime so if it is feasible, I will keep an eye open for portability issues. But realistically, I think that it will be years before anything we work with will be deployed on Railo even if we officially support it. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268955 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
