I would compare the features before settling on Home. Business and Ultimate have more features than home does...especially in dealing with networking.
Eric -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Sorge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 4:19 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge Well since I have a server that has Win2K3 Server, CF7.2 and SQL 2000, I may just go ahead and get the home version. Since my dev machine is a desktop and my server is a Dell PowerEdge, I really see no reason to shell out the extra $40.00 just to get IIS. I have DW set up to load the files to the server on save anyway, and I do not recall the last time I actually served up my sites on the localhost. My laptop though will have to stay XP since is is a Pentium III with only 500mb of ram (I only use to to do dev work on the train ride to and from work, and I synch the updated pages/sp's/tables onto my server). All of my customers sites are hosted on the same platform as my dev server, and I like to have my dev environment the same as their production servers. Bruce On 2/16/07, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It still amazes me how many people would rather spend more money rather > then > learn apache. If you need other features that the business version > provides, then by all means go for it, but I don't think IIS is worth > paying > the extra $ for. > > You can set up apache in about 10 mins (ok maybe an hour or so if its your > first time), and it will probably be easier then getting CF to work with > IIS > on vista. > > > Russ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:270039 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
