Here's a suggestion in an effort to satisfy both sides of the debate (again just a suggestion- don't bite my head off)...
How about listing the Company Name down or its parent and add a description as simply "Adult Entertainment" with descriptions of how CF is being used in the site. No link or Snap previews. What we want to communicate is the diversity of industries using CF, right? No matter how sleazy the industry is, it is still a legit and a $ubstantial part of the web. Adult entertainment and the Web is akin to the reality Life and Taxes. My 2cents. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Nadel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:26 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site > > I think we should totally exclude porn. It's not like the $10 billion > that Americans alone spend on it each year (src: > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/21/60minutes/main585049.shtml) > event makes a blip on the grand scale of things ;) > > > ...................... > Ben Nadel > Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX7 Developer > www.bennadel.com > > Need ColdFusion Help? > www.bennadel.com/ask-ben/ > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:273169 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
