Not if one server goes down with half of your users on it. With session replication, those users will hit one of the other servers with their sessions in tact (well, as long as there wasn't too much latency in the replication) and they won't know that the server crashed at all.
On 5/11/07, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to ask a question though, as I have no experience come > clusters.. > > But isn't sticky sessions better, and if so that makes the serialize > redundant does it not. -- mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Macromedia ColdFusion MX7 Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:277750 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
