You don't need to delay the emails anymore... What version of CF are you using?
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jose-- > > Thanks for the response. Creating a deliberate delay on the cfmail (with > the udf you suggested), I assume, would be to keep the server from getting > overloaded, correct? > > As to the "heaviness" of the email, it would be extremely light, > containing only the text which the user has posted in the forum and a link > to the thread. > > Thanks again for the response! > > Joel > > >Hi Joel > > > >This would no doubt cause some delay on your mail spool, I do recall that > CF > >used to have a limit of 40 on the cc/bcc fields but I think this was > fixed > >in version 5 upwards. > > > >I guess you could test it and see what happens, say to a gmail account. > > > >If you did go down the route of looping cfmail you could maybe cause a > delay > >between each occurance of the tag by using say a udf to cause a pause in > the > >code: > > > >http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/sleep > > > >Also be sure to keep your emails layout to a minimun / not html heavy > etc. > > > >Sorry for the rushed response. > > > >HTH Jose Diaz > > > > > >On 5/11/07, Joel Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Macromedia ColdFusion MX7 Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:277739 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
