Btw, just for clarity, the udf library is being used, of course, for just a couple functions to be used within the application.cfm.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael E. Carluen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 11:45 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Using cfinclude and udfs on application.cfm > > Hi all. I am updating a legacy app that is still using an application.cfm > (not a .cfc). The update simply adds a cfinclude tag for a udf library. > Is > there anything "illegal" (for a lack of a better term) about adding > cfincludes on an application.cfm? > > It works, but would like to confirm whether or not the practice is not > recommended or would post a risk down the line. > > Thanks all. > > Michael > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| CF 8 â Scorpio beta now available, easily build great internet experiences â Try it now on Labs http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs_adobecf8_beta Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:281382 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
