Thank you all for the input on this topic. I defiantly think that in the short term and to get started Fusebox would have the smallest learning curve - which would allow us to get going fairly quick. While that is great, our main goal here is to adopt a framework that will be flexible and grow with us. We do not want to go down a path and in 2 years say....man I wish we would have taken a little extra time to adopt xyz framework over the one we chose.
I think we have pretty much decided that we are going to use ColdSpring to take care of IoC. So let me throw this out, does any one of the frameworks lend itself better to the use of ColdSpring, and possible Transfer or Reactor? I have used ColdSpring with a Fusebox app and it seemed to work well, however I am not sure if it just works easier or better with other frameworks. Sorry if these seem like redundant questions, just trying to get everything that is on the top of my head out. On a side note, I am the only one that has any Fusebox experience and would not like to put that into our equation in this evaluation of which is best suited for us. Thanks again! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion 8 beta - Build next generation apps today, with easy PDF and Ajax features - download now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:284391 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
