Dinner wrote: > On 8/22/07, Sean Corfield wrote: >> >> The point of code coverage is *measurability*. By definition, you get >> better coverage by having better tests but that's irrelevant to the >> process of figuring out the *amount* of coverage. > > I could see how one could say "I tested for X" but it's the "out of X" > bit that seems like it could go on for ever. Thus, the percentage > bit- how do you know how much you've done if you don't really > know how much you have to do?
You know how much you have to do: every line. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion 8 - Build next generation apps today, with easy PDF and Ajax features - download now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:286805 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
