You are missing my point. I'm not saying a person is not responsible for their own credentials, however, you know how the media is.
My original point was that it is too inexpensive NOT to secure the information. Especially, to protect dummy people from themselves. I care about the other guy even if the other guy gots not smarts. M!ke -----Original Message----- From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: SSL Necessary? Important? o_O Mike, if your bank account gets hacked dude because YOU used the same username/password for every site the only person to blame here is YOU. I'm sorry, but this thinking is just way backwards. Should the church also be responsible if someone stole your ATM card and the PIN number just happened to be the same as your password?! YOU made the mistake, not the church. I'm *in agreement *that account identity information needs to be encrypted in the database. On Jan 24, 2008 1:23 PM, Dawson, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't matter whose responsibility it is. If a bank account gets > hacked because of the church's web site, it will hurt the credibility > of the church. > > M!ke ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:297349 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
