Here are the results of your code (again BD for J2EE running on JBoss AS 4.22):
string & string&: 33251ms String Length: 390000 cfsavecontent: 62ms String Length: 570006 I ran the test several times, mainly because the results for cfsavecontent looked so much like an outlier, but I got similar results. I'll have to dig up that code you posted, but in general since BlueDragon for J2EE sits on top of a java application server it can access the java.lang.runtime object no problem. When I get home tonight I'll run these tests again using open BlueDragon for J2EE, but I doubt there will be any differences. regards, larry >That's pretty cool, Larry. I was wondering about BD and Smith. >Will J2EE BD let you create the java.lang.runtime object to get memory >usage etc? If so, I would be interested in seeing the results of my >version of the test which reported the memory increase for each test. >(I posted the code yesterday. Let me know if the word-wraps trashed >it). > >~Brad > >========================= > >Rick, > >I thought I run your code test cfset vs cfsavecontent on a slightly >different platform - BlueDragon for J2EE running on JBoss AS 4.22 on an >XP Pox (intel core 2 duo with 2gig memory). Here are the results: > >cfset 145861ms : 488895 > >cfsavecontent 766ms : 488895 > >regards, >larry ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:306831 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
