Dan, I already suggested this approach to IAN nearly a month ago-- twice. http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:307447 http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:307626
If he thought there was merit in that he probably would have tried it already. ~Brad -----Original Message----- From: Dan G. Switzer, II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Threads should be used with caution, because each thread is going to be taking up memory (although I'm not sure how much memory each thread uses.) Spawning off threads like this is in rapid fire succession is a good way for the JVM to run out of memory and once that happens, everything becomes really unstable. I'd try to really limit the number of threads your creating. I'd even look at limiting things to a fixed number of worker threads. Try dividing the work load between like 5 or 6 threads. Have each thread process it's share of the work load (i.e. each work load would handle 1/5 of the workload--so w/500 records, thread one would work on records 1-100, thread 2 would work on records 101-200, etc.) -Dan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:308867 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
