Yep. If anything, the extensive use of the application scope would speed up your ajax calls. Using the app scope is otherwise unrelated to the fact that your app is all ajax.
In terms of MVC, each of your ajax calls would result in a *view* of the data, in whatever format that may be. Dominic 2008/12/1 Andy Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Would an established framework like Model Glue or Mach II work well with an > all AJAX app? From what I've heard those frameworks store lots of stuff in > the app, and session, scope. > > > andy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dominic Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 5:59 AM > To: cf-talk > Subject: Re: To cfinterface or not to cfinterface > > Personally, I think this is a mistake. I would lean towards using a well > established MVC framework (Model Glue, Mach II, Fusebox, etc) as your > 'facade'. The established frameworks will offer you far more flexibility, > functionality and code seperation than a single homegrown cfc ever could. In > other words, let the interface to your model (your components and there > business logic) be a fully fledged system that is designed for that purpose > as opposed to a linear, single file. > > My two cents > > Dominic > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:316074 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
