I guess mike moved this already... sorry we all know whom it's for.
> I'm the first to admit that sometimes(ok most times) I just ain't > right...... > But dude, I swear that crack you are smoking is laced with draino!! > > What's the point? Or what are you going to do with a "light" version? > If Adobe makes a light version then people will bitch because it > doesn't have all the bells and whistles of the full version. And of > course you will want it for free which of course Adobe can do because > they don't actually pay their employees they just give them a tootsie > pop and a "good job" slap upon the ass (Sean quit smiling!). > > Why does this weigh so upon your chest? Are you jealous that we don't > have a cf light since of course there is php light & .net light & ruby > on light, etc.... and we are being left out, must be a conspiracy(of > course led by friggin M$). > > You don't have to use Adobe's version which I know is sometimes hard > because you want to use the real deal but Railo is looking pretty > sweet & I am either buying cf9 for my apple serve that I haven't used > yet or putting Railo on it and I am a die hard adobe cf guy but hey if > Railo does the job..... > > Now with Railo & openBD there is absolutely really no real plausible > reason for a cf light. > > If you have to have cf light then I will send you a flashlight with a > Ben sticker on it. > > I see only 2 real reasons for a light version: > 1. To expect it to be free > 2. For portability > > And we basically already have both now. > > "I'm not too sure the motivation is strong enough to push that worthy > effort forward speedily." > What worthy effort? If you haven't seen or noticed the "worthy effort > & motivation" that Railo is generating then you need to check it out. > Ummm actually on second thought no you don't, actually you should go > check out php lol. > > And Charlie.. Will said he's gunna jack you up! > > > I resisted the attemptation of voicing my opinion on the current CF > > > but I feel probably it's sensible to get it out of my chest. Came > > cross a thread either on digg or reddit about a week ago asking > Adobe > > to "Lose Weight" on CF and the like. Today I ran into the following > > > URL, http://www.rebol.com/article/0381.html, I concur with the > > author's key point, that is, a lot of times, less is more. Having > > said that, I should say I can understand Adobe's rationale for > making > > CF so BIG, in the meantime, I would venture to say, making a light > > version CF shouldn't take a lot of effort considering the fact that > > > Source Code is ALREADY there. Yes, I'm aware of the existence of CF > > > open source effort, however, I'm not too sure the motivation is > strong > > enough to push that worthy effort forward speedily. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Don > > Chunshen Li ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:316226 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
