just a note.
when it comes down to it is all about the code.
whether it is UD4 or CFS, both have sufficient text editing features.
you still need to be able to read, write & understand the base code.
UD4 is incredible visual environment for whipping out fast apps.
It has saved me huge amount of Dev time.
it can handle "complex sites", but that all comes down to the skill level of
the user.
its a WYSIWYG if you use it as such, or it is a nice note pad like studio if
you again use it as such.
in my working environment, i couldn't function, quickly & effectively
without either!
just my 2 cents : ]
-paul
Web Developer, NBBJ
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
614 241-3534
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
614 449-1681
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 47658358
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Wolfinger [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:50 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Setting UltraDev as Dreamweaver Integration
>
> As much as I like Macromedia, you can't really do to complex site building
> with CF using UD or UD4. I have gone to an NDA of the UD4 build and was
> impressed about how they improved tables and really did a lot better job
> implementing CF, but for ultimate flexibility you are going to need to be
> using studio or your favorite code editor. UD4 is a good option for the
> design team though.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Barnum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Setting UltraDev as Dreamweaver Integration
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
