On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 6:34 AM, John M Bliss <bliss.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > So I thought I'd revisit this three months later (SEE OP for context): > > Integers are number of explicit "hits" on indeed.com:
I think it just proves how unscientific any use of indeed.com can be :) > - Framework - 11/16 hits - 2/21 hits - 5/16 hits > - FuseBox - 76 - 130 - 161 > - Mach-ii - 72 - 42 - 51 > - Model-Glue - 61 - 27 - 38 > - ColdBox - 13 - 5 - 38 > - CFWheels - 0 - 0 - 4 > - OnTap - 0 - 0 - 0 > - FW1 - ? - ? - 1 Essentially these are in order of age (well, except for onTap - but Isaac hasn't ever done much to promote it to anything like the same degree at the other frameworks) so it should be no surprise that the longer-lived frameworks get more hits. > - All CF - ? - ? - 3523 You might be able to reasonably assert that only about 10% of CFers use a framework from this (and I think you'd be about right). When the frameworks folks have published download numbers, they typically total out to about 10% of total CF developers so that also ties in. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:333736 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
