On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Steve Bryant <st...@bryantwebconsulting.com> wrote: > I think it is quite a bit unlike any other ColdFusion framework out there. It > isn't hub-and-spoke (where all requests are routed through index.cfm, for > example). It doesn't require OO. It does, however, provide pretty significant > automation and allow for very concise (but still expressive) code.
I notice that layouts are provided through CFCs that output HTML. The example shows the convolutions needed to avoid extraneous whitespace, such as running functions together: ... </cffunction><cffunction name="body" access="public" output="yes"> ... (and I believe your example still generates unwanted whitespace since you have a blank line between your opening <cfcomponent> tag and the first <cffunction> tag?). This seems to be worst of both worlds to me. Have you considered using custom tags or plain old include files for the elements of the layout instead? -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:340448 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
