Ultimately it's whatever works best for you. The nice part of wireframing is that it clearly defines your layout before you've used any of your design budget. That way you don't have to redesign anything if the layout you propose changes. It's cheaper to alter a wireframe than to alter a design.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Rick Faircloth <ric...@whitestonemedia.com > wrote: > > I've always done my mock-ups in full-color and > detail in Photoshop. (my clients understand it better...) > And once they accept a design, I have the main site > graphics for the site ready to go, instead of having to > turn from a wire frame, which seems to be just for the > purpose of "layout approval", to actual graphics creation, > I just need to cut up my Photoshop graphics and stick > them on the page. > > Is there any benefit to going the "WireframeSketcher" > route over using Photoshop? > > Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:rcam...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:34 AM > To: cf-talk > Subject: Re: wireframe for developers > > > http://wireframesketcher.com/ > > I reviewed it here: > http://www.coldfusionjedi.com/index.cfm/2010/12/21/Review-WireframeSketcher > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:52 AM, John M Bliss <bliss.j...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > What's your current favorite wireframe development tool? > > > > -- > > John Bliss - http://about.me/jbliss > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:340965 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
