I'm not sure, Bryan.  Apparently, I've already forgotten
what Peter wrote, anyway.  I guess it didn't bother me,
whatever it was.  I pretty thick-skinned, anyway.

@Peter:  you mentioned "terminated by a big fat tongue, to
suggest the tone to interpret with."  Not so much that,
probably (I don't remember), but usually use that to suggest
exhaustion, especially after wrestling with this issue for
the last few weeks and testing so many approaches.

I'll never mean to personally offend anyone.  I've never seen
that be of any benefit in any situation. That's not to say
that my comments won't offend sometimes, but I try to use
verbiage and tone that doesn't.

We're all big boy and girls and can handle the give and
take that families usually have to deal with. (ahhh, how sweet :o)


-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:br...@electricedgesystems.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 11:33 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Need some perspective...


Wow....what did I miss?

On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:13 -0400, Peter Boughton wrote:

> My reply to Rick was not condescending, since to be so requires intent,
and there was none.
> 
> My aim with all my responses to this list is to be helpful and try to make
the web a better place. I try to write replies keeping in mind that the post
may well be used as a reference by others - erring on the side of lack of
knowledge is usually the better option since you never know who might later
be reading it, in addition to the person being responded to.
> 
> 
> At time of writing, the post was four times the average post length, and
followed on from a focused reply of "I want continuous updates; that's what
you've got" to wandering across the whole spectrum of the topic being
covered here. That constitutes long and rambling for me, and - in case you
missed it - that line was terminated with a big fat tongue, to specifically
suggest the tone to interpret with.
> 
> I'm not sticking my head in the sand, I'm doing the complete opposite: I'm
saying "take some time to read about HTML5 from authoritative sources, and
you'll see it really is becoming all the things you want - a continuous
standard that the browser vendors are actually working towards implementing;
we really are in a better place than ten years ago".
> 
> I never said we should not be pressing for better browsers - I very much
dislike *all* browsers; they all suck in different ways, (and I'd love to
have the resources to do something about that).
> 
> And yes, these days, even Microsoft have actually been making efforts,
with IE9 - it's still far from perfect, but compared to previous versions
it's a great improvement.
> 
> If there's any particular or general view which you (or anyone) feels I
have missed, please feel free to re-iterate it and I'll address it directly.
> 
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:345916
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to