I guess the fw/1 docs must have improved since i last looked at it then, good to hear.
Regards Russ Michaels On Jul 24, 2012 1:24 PM, "AJ Mercer" <ajmer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think FW/1 is great for a barebones framework where you don't want it > getting in your way. I think the documentation and examples are excellent. > As I understand it, the next version will be packaged with DI/1 ( > dependency > Injection) and with routing you can sort of do ReST stuff (though I don't > think it is as good as Taffy). > > cfWheels has a plugin architecture that has a lot of stuff that can help > you build a site very quickly. It has it's own ORM. It has very > good documentation. > > Both have very friendly and helpful community. > > > If you build your application with services/domain model, you can pretty > much use and MVC framework and without too much effort port to the other. > Also, if you want to take advantage of ReSt built into ACF10, you will be > able to use your service layer. > > On 24 July 2012 19:53, Sandra Clark <sclarkli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > So I'm on a new contract and part of the contract requirements is > > converting > > an old fusebox (procedural) app to a newer framework. I've mostly been > > doing Model-Glue in past few years, but because of the XML setup, it > > doesn't > > seem to be an option here. > > > > > > > > Two of the applications (which are newer) were done in CFWheels and are > > currently running on CF7. The new site will be running on CF10. > > > > > > > > Current developers on the project are not familiar with OO at all (but > that > > is going to have to change, because the requirements for the project > > require > > OO). As well the requirement is for an ORM. I definitely want a > > dependency > > Injector and the ability to create testing modules easily. Since I have > to > > get the current developers up to speed on OO I'm not too concerned about > > requiring a new framework. > > > > > > > > Eventually, the application is going to have to generate a ton of XML and > > rely on web services for many of its tasks to allow outside services to > > consume its data. > > > > > > > > So biggest contenders are: > > > > > > > > CFWheels, ColdBox and FW/1. > > > > > > > > While I know frameworks are a religious experience to some (I survived > the > > original fusebox framework wars), I'd love to see opinions (both pro's > and > > con's) for the frameworks I've mentioned especially in relation to any of > > the requirements I've noted above. > > > > > > > > What's your experience with the frameworks both from a development and > > testing perspective along with actually running them in an enterprise > level > > environment? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for any help you can give me with this. > > > > > > > > Sandra Clark > > > > > > > > By the way, anyone going to RiaCon this year? > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:351955 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
