Perfect. Thanks!
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Raymond Camden <raymondcam...@gmail.com>wrote: > > cfwddx still works, doesn't it? Why not just use it? Sure, XML is a bit > fat, but if you just want something quick and dirty, there is no reason not > to use it, especially if you are the only reader. > > Outside of that - look at serializeJSON/deserializeJSON. > > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:26 AM, John M Bliss <bliss.j...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi! Time-back-way-back, the best/easiest way to write a cfquery result > to a > > file was to use cfwddx. What's the current best/easiest way? (So that > it's > > easy to read the file and re-instantiate the result.) > > > > -- > > John Bliss - http://about.me/jbliss > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:353347 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
