Yeah - Fantastic cfx but its a pity that I just can't decipher the
documentation for it. I hope Jukka (if he's reading) isn't insulted, but its
not the clearest thing in the world and there are a lot of crucial typos.
Would it be too much to ask someone who comprehensively knows IML syntax to
write a clearer guide?
-------------------------------------------------------
Rich Wild
Senior Web Designer
-------------------------------------------------------
e-mango.com ltd Tel: 01202 587 400
Lansdowne Place Fax: 01202 587 401
17 Holdenhurst Road
Bournemouth Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BH8 8EW, UK http://www.e-mango.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This message may contain information which is legally
privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
unauthorised disclosure, copying, distribution or use
of this information is strictly prohibited. Such
notification notwithstanding, any comments, opinions,
information or conclusions expressed in this message
are those of the originator, not of e-mango.com ltd,
unless otherwise explicitly and independently indicated
by an authorised representative of e-mango.com ltd.
-------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dain Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25 April 2001 09:00
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFX_IMAGE
>
>
> I've used CFX_Image in a heavy production environment. In
> fact, we used it
> to literally *create* images on-the-fly from other images as
> well as text,
> replacing over 1,000 "heading" images, using the IML language
> provided by
> the tag (it kicks ass).
>
> I can't tell you how great that tag is -- with a little trial
> and error,
> you'll find that it's the best tag for this type of image creation and
> manipulation. Period.
>
> Dain Anderson
> Caretaker, CF Comet
> http://www.cfcomet.com/
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Lugassy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:37 AM
> Subject: Re: CFX_IMAGE
>
>
> > I've heard there are some problem with concurent
> conncetions to CFX.,..
> > true?>|
> >
> >
> > "Kay Smoljak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > >I'm about to use the tag CFX_IMAGE extensivley on my new project.
> > > >Is it reliable enough? Is there anything I should
> consider? mem usage?
> > > >performance? Is there a better tag?
> > >
> > > We were using it and were very happy with its operation
> and feature set,
> > > except the quality of the jpegs it output, which were
> below par. We
> ended
> > up
> > > writing our own - http://developer.perthweb.com.au - but
> if you're only
> > > working with gifs you won't have a problem.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kay.
> > >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
