> Anyone have any real life experiences on how much faster it REALLY
> is? How about on NT?
You need to be careful here as the system requirements are different - a
common trap.
We discovered though with the Release Candidate on NT with like for like
systems, CF5 was actually slower for a lot of the tests we performed
sometimes by as much as a third. These unscientific tests where based on
CF4.5's rec spec.
Again though, don't read too much into this as CF5 is designed for more RAM
(256Mb min compared to CF4.5's 32 - reading min specs off the boxes) and
win2000. Be aware that if you want to upgrade, you'll need to take a new
look at the system specs as your old machine may not cut the mustard. (more
relevant to the smaller sites on low traffic setups)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 July 2001 14:40
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Review: CF 5.0
>
>
> I particularly find this interesting:
>
> On Windows 2000, Macromedia benchmarks indicate that ColdFusion
> Server 5 processes page requests up to 5 times faster than ColdFusion
> Server 4.5.1.
>
> Anyone have any real life experiences on how much faster it REALLY
> is? How about on NT?
> --
>
> Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations
>
> _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.twcreations.com/
> 954.721.3452
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
