Saying that Studio 5 went into a specific release would be covered under the
NDA until MM puts it up on their beta site. Of course, a fast check shows it
up on the site so your ok with that statement.
> It looks as if Studio 5 just went into RC 1. ( I better download
before
> they cut off my access altogether )
>
>
> At 10:01 PM 09/03/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >I looked at your posts and didn't see anything that could fall under the
> >NDA. You said it exists and that's public info. I think its just an
> >overzealous law clerk who's jumping because he just got on the list. Its
> >interesting that I have not received anything about hosting NDA material
> >over the list.
> >
> > > I posted something on this topic over on the CF-Partners list.
> > > They were angry at me for comments about CF Studio 5 Beta.
> > > They were polite and professional.
> > > I apologized and asked for copies of the messages where they
thought I
> > > violated my agreement. A quick search of the CFDJ archives (and the
> > > CF-TALK ) archives did not reveal any messages violating the
agreement.
> > >
> > > At 10:53 AM 09/03/2001 +0100, you wrote:
> > > >Yup...you and me both Thomas!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > >Sent: 03 September 2001 10:43
> > > > >To: CF-Talk
> > > > >Subject: RE: CF5 Pro SN
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> I doubt it was an honest mistake with a user name of
> > > > >> "warez".
> > > > >
> > > > >Although, as I just got mailed by Macroaire about letting slip some
> >stuff
> > > > >about the CF5 beta, I can bet Mr. Warez will be having a visit...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
