This might better fit over on the CF-Partners list.
I doubt there are any legal issues.
I'm curious about the efficiency of a custom tag that does nothing but
drop in some custom JavaScripts. Have you tested it for efficiency of
using a custom tag vs an include vs just putting it in the page? For that
matter, has anyone done and number crunching for Custom Tag vs Include vs
just putting it in the page?
Since JavaScript is not processed by CF, obviously just putting it into
the page is the most efficient. I can see the benefits of using an include
if the same JavaScripts are used in many places. I'm not sure why you
would want to make it into a custom tag.
At 09:37 AM 09/18/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>I know this is OT, but I thought those of you in this list would be best
>able to answer this question.
>
>We use Dreamweaver UD4 with CFStudio to build our applications, in doing
>this, we use some of the core MM JavaScript in our sites. We've recently
>created a common JavaScript library for all our sites using a CustomTag to
>call the script into any site. Included in this library, we added 3 or 4 of
>the core MM scripts we often use, is there a legal problem involved if
>someone downloads this library from us with the MM scripts attached? Is
>there a disclaimer we need to add or is this just something that MM expects
>will happen?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Joshua Miller
>Web Development::Programming
>Eagle Technologies Group, Inc.
>www.eagletgi.com
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
