<smile> Cheaper, yes, better... I have never used "better" and "Microsoft"
in the same sentence when it comes to Internet connectivity.
All joking aside, you actually want your upstream provider to block it at
their router since presumably there is substantially more bandwidth at their
end of your link. That way the Proxy server doesn't even need to see it.
Best regards,
Dennis Powers
UXB Internet
(203)879-2844
http://www.uxbinfo.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 8:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: The New worm bites!!!
alas, some of our clients are convinced that MS Proxy server is a
better/cheaper choice than hardware routers.... <sighs> Thanks anyway.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 5:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: The New worm bites!!!
Try this:
>From CISCO:
Using Network-Based Application Recognition and Access Control Lists for
Blocking the "Code Red" Worm at Network Ingress Points
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/nbar_acl_codered.shtml
Best regards,
Dennis Powers
UXB Internet
(203)879-2844
http://www.uxbinfo.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: The New worm bites!!!
How are people fighting this thing? It uses Port 80 so filtering is not
working well, has anyone else found something to concentrate on to filter at
the router or firewall. It is not doing damage since I am patched, but it
is creating enough traffic to slow website performance.
Thanks,
Robert Filipovich
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
