I ran tests on Apache 1.12 on windows NT 4.0/sp 5 on a dual PIII 600 with 256MB ram. Serving a .5K file it was able to push about 750 pages/sec. Serving a 14K file it dropped to about 525 pages/sec, but I also noted that the 100MB network was saturated. Probably was bottlenecking the LAN (I think this works out to about 60Mbits not counting network overhead). I never got to the follow up test which were to deliver a .CFM page with only HTML in it (test the speed of the Cold Fusion module and test a .CFM page with a database call that does nothing. Also did not get to test the other web servers (website and IIS and Apache on Linux) as intended. Justin -----Original Message----- From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:27 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Apach vs IIS speed on Windows We all know the security concerns and what not, but what is a speed comparrison between the two. Like how many pages per second can I expect Apache to have and how many can I expect IIS to have. I would like to use Apache but not if it is gonna hurt me speed wise. I stay on top of the security issues by unmapping everything but CFM. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
