> You really shouldn't use MS Access with Cold Fusion... (it's probably a > given that this is true, but with California State budget cuts, it'll be a > while before we save up enough pennies to buy anything better)
What about MySQL? It's still Free to my knowledge... You may want to look into this. > If you do use MS Access, you should set CF's threads to 1: T/F? No, we keep our threads normal... Never had a problem. > If you do use MS Access, and set the threads > 1, you risk corrupting your > DB: T/F? Not that I know of. There is a performance hit due to the fact that Access uses table level locking during inserts/updates. Also, it doesn't shrink very well, so you can end up with some extremely bloated DB's over time (compact and repair when you can...) but otherwise, it functions as advertised. HTH, Jeff Garza Lead Developer/Webmaster Spectrum Astro, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spectrumastro.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
