> Better: ODBC from a portability point of view, OLE DB from a technical > point of view (see faster). > Faster: OLE DB. In this case (SQL2K) ODBC is actually a layer on top of > OLE DB. That layer introduces some performance loss, and also an extra > point of failure.
OLE DB in combination with MSSQL produces extremely unhelpful error messages, at least this is what I experienced. I personally prefer decent error reporting over a bit of performance. Cheers Michiel ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
