> Thanks for the clarification on Access, I believe you're > right since it's not a truly relational product.
I don't think that's really the reason, though, but rather that its locking is less granular than SQL Server's or Oracle's. > However, I always use CFTry and CFCatch with Inserts and > Update queries. The majority of errors occur when modifying > the data. There's nothing wrong with that, I don't think. What I should have said, was that you don't need to use it within the CFTRANSACTION. The CFTRANSACTION won't run subsequent queries if the first one fails (assuming they're using the same datasource, of course). There's nothing wrong with placing the entire CFTRANSACTION within a CFTRY block, to catch exceptions returned by the CFTRANSACTION. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Why Share? Dedicated Win 2000 Server · PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionc FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
