Hmm, thanks. I'll check that out.

Jamie

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:25:07 -0000, in cf-talk you wrote:

>I've not done it but according to the MS site there is a filter 
available
>from Adobe that allows you to do it. 
>http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/pro
dte
>chn
>ol/sharepoint/evaluate/featfunc/mssearch.asp
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jamie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 25 February 2002 17:04
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: Joining Tables from Different Datasources... Possible?
>
>
>>if you use MS Indexing instead of Verity
>
>You can't index binaries (PDFs) though, can you?
>
>Thanks,
>Jamie
>
>On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:51:29 -0000, in cf-talk you wrote:
>
>>Just a thought, but if you use MS Indexing instead of Verity, along 
with
>>other advantages (it's faster and self-maintaining)you can build sql
>>statements combining db tables and file indexes.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jamie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 25 February 2002 15:19
>>To: CF-Talk
>>Subject: Re: Joining Tables from Different Datasources... Possible?
>>
>>
>>Thanks for the replies. What I am doing is attempting to join a Verity
>>result set on a SQL server table. The table contains abstracts,
>>display codes, titles etc., of PDF's that Verity has also indexed.
>>
>>Currently, to get a match, I'm using nested loops to determine
>>matches, and I modify the original Verity result set using
>>QuerySetCell. This takes quite a long time because of the nested
>>loops. It would be nice to do a SQL-like join instead.
>>
>>Maybe the solution is to write the Verity result set to a temporary
>>SQL table and then do the join.
>>
>>Recommendations?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Jamie
>>
>>
>>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:08:32 -0500, in cf-talk you wrote:
>>
>>>If you're using SQL Server, AND the databases are on separate 
machines,
> 
>>>you
>>>need to LINK the databases from within enterprise manager.  Then, when
 
>>>you
>>>reference database.dbo.tablename, SQL Server will do the rest.  If I 
>>>recall
>>>correctly, it is not enough to simply register the server, they must 
>>>also be
>>>Linked.  To link a server in SQL Server 2000, choose "new linked 
>>>server"
>>>under the "security" tab for a registered server.  I believe you need 
>>>to
>>>make the link on both servers, but if you don't, then the DSN that you
 
>>>use
>>>for the "datasource" property in your CFQUERY tag will need to refer 
to
> 
>>>the
>>>server that defined the active link.  Oh, while I have no direct proof
 
>>>of
>>>this, I believe it is best to weigh the size of the tables and 
activity
> 
>>>of
>>>the server when choosing which server initiates the join in your 
>>>CFQUERY
>>>tag.  Especially when servers are separated by thousands of miles (as 
>>>mine
>>>are) it seems to make a difference to let the server with the largest
>>>portion of the data crunch the join.  Also, for security reasons, I 
>>>have
>>>been told it may not be practical to Link a server that is behind a 
>>>firewall
>>>to a server outside the firewall.  Rather, a one-way link from inside 
>>>to out
>>>would make better sense.  This might apply if your webserver runs SQL 
>>>Server
>>>locally in a DMZ.
>>>
>>>Good Fortune,
>>>Rick Walters
>>>Webmaster, Davita Laboratory Services
>>>Office: (800) 604-5227
>>>Cell: (407) 491-9848
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jamie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:05 PM
>>>To: CF-Talk
>>>Subject: Joining Tables from Different Datasources... Possible?
>>>
>>>How would I do a join of tables from two different datasources?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
Why Share?
  Dedicated Win 2000 Server · PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
  Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup
  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionc
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to