I know the DE() function which is commonly used with IIF is resource intensive. I once stripped out a sizeable amount of IIF() functions from a page and put in CFIF tags in place and picked up a noticeable amount in the load times. In a lot of cases the IIF() is used, people could have used CFIF.
Snipe - <CF_BotMaster Network="EFNet" Channel="ColdFusion"> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 3:46 PM Subject: Re: cfif in cfset > You know, I don't know the answer to that question. I use it often enough, > and I don't notice a problem. > > It is the only thing that you can use accomplish the problem. > > You could write a function and use cfscript to take care of it for you. > > At 11:40 PM 3/2/2002 +0200, you wrote: > >Nick, > > > > > You want to use IIF > > > >I've heard it's resource intensive, true? > ______________________________________________________________________ Get Your Own Dedicated Windows 2000 Server PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionb FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
