At 10:13 AM 4/1/2002 -0800, you wrote: >Wow that article was negative. Maybe we should just go back to using >smoke signals to communicate.
Oh, I dunno. I think the article was in line with many things that I have thought. And they did seem to present both sides of the story. The issues addressed in the article were valid. Or maybe I'm just negative. >The vector concept of web presentation is doubtlessly the wave of the >future and Flash is the defacto player of choice. If the current search >engine paradigm is holding back the development in this medium should we >hold back development in Flash or should we reward the engine that gets >with the program and finds a way to index flash content. I'm no flash expert, but I really think the limitations that were outlined in the article are valid criticisms. I bet there is money to be maid in write a search engine to index flash content. -- Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Need a Web Developer? Contact me! AIM: Reboog711 | Fax / Phone: 860-223-7946 -- My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
