pssssst, just so everyone knows, Kath loves Netscape................. just don't tell her I told you :O)
-----Original Message----- From: Shawn McKee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 April 2002 18:34 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CSS and Netscape - was(CSS and dynamically changing classes) It completely conflicts with the standards concept. The point is to get everyone on board with a feature rich set of standards. If, as a web designer/developer, you choose to use proprietary features of one browser then don't complain when you loose customers because they don't use the browser you prefer or when you have to code work around's to support multiple browsers. I don't know that IE is any more compliant than NS. I do feel it is more forgiving of poor programming. I typically build for NS and most everything then works in IE. Shawn McKee -----Original Message----- From: Valerie L. Criswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:27 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CSS and Netscape - was(CSS and dynamically changing classes) This doesn't directly align with the standardization argument, but it still bespeaks a major disadvantage of NS. What about mentioning that it's difficult for us to reccommend the NS browsers to our Intranet type clients because it doesn't offer the same rich non-standard features that IE does? In those environments we can expolit IE coolness, but what does NS offer in comparision? btw, you can add my name. ~Val Criswell ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
