I doubt MM would (nor should they be obligated to). However, I think (with the exception of CFX's and encrypted tags) the beauty of open source comes out (believe it or not, there's more to open source than politics and Slashdot MS bashing) - many eyes, so problems are unlikely to go unnoticed.
However, to truly answer your question: no. There's no guarantee of the quality, security, or safety of the code. If this is unacceptable per your business needs, then I would abandon using the free code. --- Billy Cravens -----Original Message----- From: Rafael (Alan Bleiweiss) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFLIB question I hope nobody takes offense at this question it is, however, a reasonable question from the bigger perspective of running a company... Does anyone at MM ever check the custom tags posted to the gallery or at MindTool check the UDFs posted to CFLIB for security flaws, hack code, etc? Again, to everyone on the list in general, I've never once had any contact with anyone in the CF community where there was a problem of this nature - it's just that the potential risks are huge for anyone downloading a server level tag to speed up site-deployment. My company has made use of several over the years and we don't always have the technical ability in-house to analyze them before deployment... At 10:53 AM 04/23/2002 -0400, you wrote: ><a href="javascript:history.back(-2)"> > >Where -2 means you move back two pages. > >Cheers, >Brendan > > >At 03:30 PM 4/23/2002 +0100, you wrote: > >Greetings, > > > >I know not purely CF, but > > > >Does anyone know how, or a substitute to get the history.back() function to > >move back to pages, (instead of in increments) jumping back to a page, 2 or > >more positions in the browser history, > > > >i.e. > > > >visit page one > >then > >visit page two > >then > >visit page three > > > >then click a history.back() button, > >but instead of going back to page two, > >jump directly back to page one, > > > >the reason is to access a query object again created at that point, > >that was not recreated in steps form 2 to 3. > > > >Hope this makes sense, > > > >Repsectfully, > > > >J > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
