Hi,
I wanted to give an option to my users: Preview what they have typed
before posting it. I am not able to use JavaScript for that. JavaScript is
not able to recognize Active Edit component as a Form component. the same
thing worked if I use textarea. Is there a way to do that?
Thanks in advance.
Sudheer Chakka
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they really
needed ?
No, IBM does not ship a JRE for Solaris
Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development
Unix/Linux "special guy"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:53 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they really
> needed ?
>
> Can we boost performance on Solaris by using IBMs JRE?
>
> Stace
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:25 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they really
> needed ?
>
> http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/tools.nsf/dw/java-all-
> byname?OpenDocum
> ent&Count=500&loc=j
>
> Jesse Noller
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Macromedia Server Development
> Unix/Linux "special guy"
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:24 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they really
> > needed ?
> >
> > Where can you get ibm's jre?
> >
> > Robert Everland III
> > Web Developer Extraordinaire
> > Dixon Ticonderoga Company
> > http://www.dixonusa.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 7:12 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they really
> > needed ?
> >
> >
> > Linus does make a good point, and I do kinda like the idea, but the
> > implementation is "the suck".
> >
> > I haven't been able to do much kernel hacking lately, but I'll track
> down
> > and check out the IBM patch when I get a chance. I also need to muck
> with
> > some JREs, IBM's jre is the fastest I know of, they're smart++.
> >
> > Jesse Noller
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Macromedia Server Development
> > Unix/Linux "special guy"
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 6:59 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they really
> > > needed ?
> > >
> > > I like Linus's model better. He states that we shouldn't limit
> > > ourselves to just processes and threads. He thinks we should have
> > > variable weight processes. Some would be as light as threads while
> > > others could be as heavy as processes, but you could also define more
> > > granular differences.
> > >
> > > I hear IBM has a new implementation of PThreads for Linux that is
> > > supposed to rock. It would be interesting to use that patch and see
> > > what kind of difference it makes with CFMX.
> > >
> > > -Matt
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:48 PM
> > > > To: CF-Talk
> > > > Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they really
> > > needed
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > > > I know that matt. There was a couple of fights over l-k about
> > > > whether
> > > or
> > > > not to actually move to a threading model with 2.4. The plain fact
> > > > is
> > > that
> > > > many people wanted to stick with the per-process method of doing
> > > things.
> > > > The actual threading implementation for Linux is pretty weak (having
> > > > worked with it a lot) but it's been improving.
> > > >
> > > > It's nothing more than a thread emulation system with the pthread
> > > > libraries. But, one can hope that they'll see the light of day and
> > > > actually move to the solaris world of thread modeling.
> > > >
> > > > :)
> > > >
> > > > Jesse Noller
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Macromedia Server Development
> > > > Unix/Linux "special guy"
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 6:27 PM
> > > > > To: CF-Talk
> > > > > Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they
> > > > > really needed ?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am sure you know this Jesse, but I'll point it out anyway. There
> > > is no
> > > > > such thing as threads in the Linux world. For Posix compliance
> > > > > Linux
> > > has
> > > > > a PThread library, but each thread is implemented using clone(),
> > > which
> > > > > is actually just a fork() with a shared stack. Thus, those are all
> > > > > processes; not threads.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 2:38 PM
> > > > > > To: CF-Talk
> > > > > > Subject: RE: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they
> > > really
> > > > > needed
> > > > > > ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dick:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Actually, I don't know who told you that, but they were
> > wrong.
> > > > > Each
> > > > > > of those "20 or so" java processes you see on Linux are actually
> > > > > nothing
> > > > > > more than Java threads. If you were on a solaris box and did a
> > > > > > ps
> > > axww
> > > > > > you'd see 1 master process with a bunch of children.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Linux threading being what it is, it displays the individual
> > > > > threads
> > > > > > as individual processes. This makes for interesting output to
> > > > > > say
> > > the
> > > > > > least.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As for the actual "cfusion" binary, this is a C launcher
> > that
> > > > > reads
> > > > > > the settings in the JVM.CONFIG file in runtime/bin, sets up the
> > > > > > environment, and is the "master control program" for CFMX/JRun.
> > > > > > It
> > > has
> > > > > > other features too, such as an autorestart function that will
> > > > > > make
> > > > > sure
> > > > > > that once executed, if the threads begin to die, they are
> > > recreated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) What do the 20 or so processes do?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nothing. They are threads. Welcome to Linux threading, it's
> > > > > > annoying, but meaningless. Those are nothing more than Java's
> > > > > worker-bees.
> > > > > > The reason you don't see them in OS/X is because OS/X has a
> > > different
> > > > > > threading model. If you did a full display on the OS/X command
> > > line to
> > > > > > display the full thread tree in flat mode, you'd see the same
> > > threads.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) Are they really necessary?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Uh, yeah. That's java creating worker processes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3) If the above is true, how can they be launched without
> > a
> > > > > C++
> > > > > > program
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The C launcher has nothing to do with the threads. The C
> > > > > launcher is
> > > > > > the functional equivalent to a ./java cfusion.jar -start default
> > > <PATH
> > > > > TO
> > > > > > ALL MY JARs and LIBRARIES> command, with some added threading
> > > > > goodness.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BTW: You can throw questions like this over the cf-linux list,
> > > it's
> > > > > easier
> > > > > > to sort through than the cf-talk list.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am going to be sending out more information about
> > CFMX-linux
> > > > > as
> > > > > > soon as I finish the master document I am writing (basically, a
> > > > > complete
> > > > > > admin/hackers guide to cfmx). It's up to 30 pages! Yay!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jesse Noller
> > > > > > Macromedia Server Development
> > > > > > (Aka - Unix guy)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 4:42 PM
> > > > > > > To: CF-Talk
> > > > > > > Subject: CFMX - why so many runtime processes & are they
> > > > > > > really
> > > > > needed?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When you start CFMX Linux it launches 20, or so, processes all
> > > named
> > > > > > > cfusion. (I assume there are similar tasks/threads on Win).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have been told that: together, these comprise the "CFMX
> > > > > environment"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was lead to understand that things such as graphics,
> > > > > > > database,
> > > web
> > > > > > > services, etc were each handled by a separate one of these
> > > > > processes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am porting CFMX Linux to Mac OS X. Under OS X I cannot run
> > > the
> > > > > > > /bin/cfusion program that apparently launches all these
> > > processes.
> > > > > (The
> > > > > > > program is Intel C++)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So I assumed that all the CF things (services/functions,
> > > whatever)
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > I could not make work under OS X were because I couldn't
> > > > > > > launch
> > > a
> > > > > > > process to handle it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This apparently is *Not True!"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > By poking around I have been able to use database (MySQL and
> > > > > PostgreSQL,
> > > > > > > graphics and web Services (almost),
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So I guess I have several questions:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) What do the 20 or so processes do?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) Are they really necessary?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3) If the above is true, how can they be launched without a
> > > > > > > C++
> > > > > program
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TIA
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dick
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
