I disagree. You've still got .cfm in the URL anyway haven't you? (disp_post.cfm).
Your site would have to be static to be fully indexed by a search engine (eg: physical files) and not dynamically generated which defeats the purpose of using CF in the first place -----Original Message----- From: Stephen R. Cassady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 9:12 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX not reading .html files like CF5! Very bad! Just upgraded to CFMX and found this out! Help! This is really really BAD! Under CF5 we ran a parse of the URL <cfloop list="#removeChars(cgi.path_info,1,len(cgi.script_name))#" delimiters="/" index="variableSet"> <cfscript> variableName = "url." & listGetAt(variableSet,1,'.'); expression = listGetAt(variableSet,2,'.'); </cfscript> <cfparam name="#variableName#" default="#expression#"> </cfloop> To all us to have http://www.spankmag.com/forums/disp_post.cfm/cc.33229/clt.30/page.html This is better for search engines - no ? in the url, makes in get searched. Anyways - we have several VERY LARGE SYSTEMS that are built this way! Now, CFMX bites the dust each and every time - not reading the files correctly! Running IIS. This is really important. I don't want to rip MX out to make it better! Stephen R. Cassady [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
