Todd, Like I stated, it really depends. Obviously, if you don't have to do it, it's unnecessary. As it stands right now, if two CFMX applications are communicating, there shouldn't be any problem invoking a web service that returns complex data types (unless you're using createObject()--which case there's a bug w/CFMX translating Query objects created within CFMX.)
CFMX and .Net have some issues w/complex data types--which if that's the case then using an XML packet as a string may be the best solution. -Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:04 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Clarification needed -- WebServices (Part II) > > Interesting. Funny that the person that emailed me basically smacked my > hand and said passing the XML as a string is a no no because then the xml > has to be parsed twice (which, ... in my example, I didn't have to parse > anything twice). > > So... I'm confused who to listen to, of course. > > ~Todd > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
