On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:21:36 -0500, in cf-talk you wrote: >> > Server.log entries, such as the following, have nothing to do with >the >> > client, correct? >> > >> > "Warning","4324","07/08/02","10:24:17",,"Template: >> > D:\websites\intranet\sign-in\index.cfm, Ran: 10 seconds." >> >> Correct. This means CF took 10 seconds to run that template (yuk). > >By placing URL vars in a "search safe URL" (like >http://mypage.cfm/test/1st), it is possible to view the exact request in >the server.log. I did this and compared with the cf debug output for >several cfm pages, and the server.log reported processing times 3-4 >times longer than what the cf debug output reported. I also looked at >the NT performance monitor settings available from the CF server >start-menu options and saw no pages take the amount of time reported by >the server.log. Because of this evidence, I believe that page download >time is reflected in the server.log numbers, at least to some degree.
That's what I was wondering. Another funny thing is that this particular template, when it shows up in the server.log, always reports 10 seconds -- never 11, 12, etc. (I have the server log >10 second requests). With other pages (that I know to be slow), there is some variance. So, does *conventional wisdom* say that the (server.log) logs are somewhat un-trustworthy, with regard to processing times? Thanks, Jamie ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
