It's still recommended, but the latest version allows for developers who
cannot (or choose not to) use development mappings. I, myself, use the
non-mappings version on two of my web sites. There are also many
enhancements made within the last 12 months: increased speed, added code
management (XML-based documentation was developed for cfObjects about 6
months ago), reduced the base tags needed, added an event-based coding
system, and other features.
One thing that I still need to make is a sample application for the
event system like the ones that Ralph Fiol made for basic cfObjects.
Many people have sent feedback saying that they loved the event system,
but weren't clear on exactly how to use it.
**Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Regan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:17 AM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: RE: cfObjects
Do you still need directory mappings set with CFObjects. That is one
reason why we choose not to use CFobjects over Fusebox at my place of
employement. But I did like your approach.
-Shawn Regan
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Brownlee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 11:05 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: cfObjects
Just discovered this list tonight and was hoping to find some developers
who were interested in the cfObjects 3.0 project. Some of the things
that I've added recently need to be tested/refined and any new ideas
have to be developed.
Visit https://sourceforge.net/projects/cfobjects/ for more details.
=======================
Steven R. Brownlee
CEO/President
Orbwave Corporation
412.519.8607
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=======================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
