I have always found peer reviews of code to be very useful, not just to
enforce standards and promote consistency, but also as a learning tool.
Perhaps we could create a few teams (we seem to have enough developers), and
then members of your team could review each other's code.
It's important to remember that a peer review isn't about criticizing
someone's code, or saying "I could have done it better". It's about making
sure that standards are met, promoting consistency, and learning from
others.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: August 6, 2001 11:19 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: Code Police what do you think
Someone has suggested to me offline that we have someone who acts as the
code police for the project. Thier duty would be to scan each piece of code
to double check to make sure it is optimized as much as possible and has all
things as specified in the futuer coding standards. What do you think as a
group?
Bob
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
