That is correct, all the arguments thus far has been CF limitations with
custom tags and such, and since fusebox only uses less than 10 total tags
(that's if you use them all at most we will use 2 or 3) we can not worry
about CF limitations. Every language has it's problems. We wanted a
methodology to help, we found one. Yes it is a done deal. And also for
record, the survey shoved 14 people currently use fusebox and 3 don't, so we
do have a majority already using it.
Robert Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Regan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:24 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: RE: CMS project comments - STOP!
Yes, I believe Robert (The project manager) said we are going to use
Fusebox.
-Shawn Regan
-----Original Message-----
From: Raley, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:15 AM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: RE: CMS project comments - STOP!
>From earlier posts I thought it was a done deal that Fusebox was the
methodology to be used.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Hannum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:07 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: Re: CMS project comments - STOP!
How can you stop or move to CF-Community? It's at the heart of what we're
going to do. Or, did I miss something. Is Fusebox for this project a done
deal?
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raley, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF_OpenSource" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:52 PM
Subject: CMS project comments - STOP!
> Can we please either stop this or move to CF-Community??? Lets move on
with
> putting together this application.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:50 PM
> To: CF_OpenSource
> Subject: RE: CMS project comments
>
>
> >CF/Fusebox also allows us to build a CMS project in half (if not less
> than)
> the time it would take to build a hybrid model using other
> methods/technologies...
>
> I would challenge you to prove this point. If you have ever seen one of
> Hal Helms' presentations you will see that planning, not the use of
> Fusebox allows one to significantly reduce the development time of a
> project.
>
> >I am intrigued into why DevX and MM have NDA's about this fantastic new
> CMS
> project your building - is it going to be an MM app :-)? Surely
> Greylock
> will be your Java/CF hybrid model you prefer? Where we can still use
> Fusebox utlising Java underneath? - either way Fusebox wins.
>
> I can't say much about this other than it is unlikely anything in our
> CMS project will affect the features of Greylock.
>
> >Oh and ours will be open source - mmmmmm think of that market share
> that
> will have - for the small to medium based markets - especially as the
> big
> boys all cost a fortune; and in some cases - pretty much stink.
>
> Check out OpenCMS and see how they are doing on market share. Just FYI.
>
> -Matt
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
